Sunday, June 23, 2013

我佛慈悲就是假!

假惺惺的人物最令人反感

人物周刊:很多社會問題,都是在佛陀時代無法想像的,比如克隆人、丁克家庭,包括同性戀現象,相信近一二十年來很多人向您求問。昨晚您說同性戀“不正常”,會不會遭來批評?

  星雲大師:同性戀的人也不會一生吧。這個對兒女人倫、社會觀感、自然的人性,不正常。不過這句“不正常”,在西方會引來同性戀者的反擊,他們的勢力很大,大家都不敢說。我在台灣敢說。
=============================
=============================
這樣有影響力的一個人竟然這樣說話。所謂的我佛慈悲就是——可以原諒一名殺母啃子的人,卻不放過一名無罪的同志。幸好俺從來不信什麼神佛,所謂大師的大愛型文字一句也看不下去,人死燈滅,現在不順乎本性過活,天堂地獄極樂世界都是假。



4 comments:

Anonymous said...

no comment

Anonymous said...

i do saw this article today.. he is talking crap =.=

Anonymous said...

世事无常无相,不须为某某狭窄的个人观点激愤。只要不作孽心安理得甭管世俗指责。相对上达赖喇嘛的思想更为豁达容纳,excerpt below is extracted from Wikipedia.

In his discussions of the traditional Buddhist view on appropriate sexual behavior, he explains the concept of "right organ in the right object at the right time," which historically has been interpreted as indicating that oral, manual and anal sex (both homosexual and heterosexual) are not appropriate in Buddhism or for Buddhists, yet he also says that in modern times all common, consensual sexual practices that do not cause harm to others are ethically acceptable and that society should not discriminate against gays and lesbians and should accept and respect them from a secular point of view. In a 1994 interview with OUT Magazine, the Dalai Lama clarified his personal opinion on the matter by saying, "If someone comes to me and asks whether homosexuality is okay or not, I will ask 'What is your companion's opinion?'. If you both agree, then I think I would say, 'If two males or two females voluntarily agree to have mutual satisfaction without further implication of harming others, then it is okay.'"

plusmy said...

Stick to the very basic of Shakamurni in Kalama Sutra's 《羯臘摩經》 teaching

1) Do not go upon what has been acquired by repeated hearing
2) Do not believe in tradition, simply because it has been handed down for many generations
3) Do not trust in anything just because it is spoken or rumoured by many
4) Do not accept what is written in a scripture or text
5) Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers or elders
6) nor upon surmise,
7) nor upon an axiom,
8) nor upon specious reasoning,
9) nor upon a bias towards a notion that has been pondered over,
10) nor upon someone's seeming ability


In Lotus Sutra, even mentioned the "bad guy" Devadatta can attain Buddha some day